Yes, African food traders have better techniques than PhD graduates in Economics

Academics like economists rely on authors and literature based on research conducted within a given time frame. Such literature has no room for adjustments as new events and knowledge emerge.  For instance, Keynesians economics was based on theories of John Maynard Keynes whose research revolved around the laws of supply and demand, among other principles of economics. Since the research was done decades ago and in specific contexts, such knowledge lacked fluidness that would have kept it fresh. To that end, studying economics has become more about memorizing old economic principles yet in real life people should be equipped with real time knowledge to respond to events as they happen.

kta.JPG

How informal markets are different

Unlike academic corridors in which economists thrive, African informal markets are open spaces where knowledge is shared as events unfold. These markets are always solving problems as they emerge and build more solutions continuously. For example, when a food commodity is in short supply traders do not just increase the price. Instead, they break bulk so that many consumers at least get a smaller share.  Another response is shortening the market out-reach such that commodities that would normally travel 400 km from the main market like Mbare in Harare to Bulawayo reduce their outreach without increasing prices.  Consumers also respond by going for substitutes, supplements and complementary commodities. In glut situations the market broadens the outreach to far-flung areas.  All these are different kinds of solutions not found in the economics text books. More importantly, in informal markets knowledge is collectively mobilized to generate solutions in ways that a whole faculty of commerce at any university cannot do through reading economics textbooks. Sadly, when economists rely on text books written by individual authors, more than 40 percent of the content in those books comprises the author’s personal opinions or thinking as opposed to collective wisdom of the mass market.

The power of experiential learning

Academics like economists also lack experiential learning without which they cannot be able to figure out how mass markets decide it is time to increase commodity prices. On the other hand, traders are acutely aware that they do not live in isolation like academics in their ivory towers. To that end, traders and informal markets know the users and uses of their knowledge. They treasure an ecosystem of knowledge sharers made up of consumers who pass on knowledge to traders who also pass it on to farmers and the cycle continues. This sharing of knowledge within an ecosystem purifies knowledge into a fluid package unlike textbooks where knowledge is closed and frozen such that there is no room to add fresh content.

Economists who read the same textbooks end up thinking and behaving like one person. While a class of 40 economists thinks the same, an ecosystem of traders in informal markets taps into diverse thoughts and experiences. To a large extent, projections by traders in the market are based on experience not figures. They know how different commodities and consumers behave at different periods of the year and that informs their projections for the next 3 – 6 months.  Experiences and knowledge from the market has taught traders to do moderate projections (not too long or too short) that fit within production cycles of particular crops (2 – 3 months).

Policy makers’ projections are rarely based on thorough evidence

Contrary to traders in African food markets, budgetary projections by African policy makers who rely on imported knowledge are barely informed by events in the market.  When the finance minister prepares a 12 month budget, what historical information informs that budget?  What consumption patterns and economic dynamics like expenditure patterns during the year inform the budget?  Absence of thorough evidence contributes to over-spending.

Ideally, the budget for the ministry of agriculture should speak to seasons and production cycles. For instance, the ministry cannot pretend that farmers demand the same amount of extension support consistently throughout the year. It is possible that the amount and intensity of extension support in winter is lower than in summer given that African agriculture is largely rain-fed. The budget should reflect all these different cycles or activities like planting, harvesting and marketing.

Most government policies do not have specific users and uses. It is important to ask who will use the agricultural policy. Who will be excluded or advantaged?  Who will benefit from an export policy or financial inclusion policy? Where are the pain points for different actors?  Why should we even be talking about rural finance as if rural areas have a distinct economy separate from an urban economy?  Who loses from government’s free inputs program?  Obviously, agro-dealers bear the market-distorting impact of free inputs.

Diversity as a source of knowledge

Diversity of demographics in mass markets also presents a lot of favorable dynamism in terms of knowledge. Found in mass markets are the youth, women, the old, the literate with wisdom, the illiterate with plenty of experience and wisdom as well as many others who bring commodity-specific and task-specific expertise.  Conversely, if you are in university, reading the same books, the thinking is the same and you cannot develop new knowledge.  Economists speak the same language, lawyers the same and engineers the same. While their knowledge is considered “pure”, it is redundant and closed in ivory towers.

As shown by informal markets, the power of many numbers explains why they traders have better techniques. Where many people come together for a shared initiative, they generate better solutions than a few graduates no matter the number of books they have read. Informal markets have a solid pathway from famers – traders – vendors – consumers through a strong information exchange ecosystem. They borrow from indigenous knowledge systems which had pathways through which knowledge was generated and pathways inherited.

Dependence on imported knowledge is the main reason why have African policy makers have remained detached from reality to the extent of expecting an individual minister Mthuli Ncube to come up with sound economic solutions from Cambridge University where he studied.  It is very clear that African academic policy makers are failing to contextualize and simplify imported knowledge. More importantly, academics should ask themselves: Who is going to be the consumer of our knowledge products? If knowledge generation is not informed by the consumer or the market, there will be a serious mismatch. The industry is not employing many PhD graduates due to this mismatch. As African countries strive to revive and strengthen industrialization, to what extent are universities informed about the needs of different industrial sectors, some of which have completely collapsed?

How responsive are institutions of higher learning?

If they really want to be relevant, academics should create space and time to hear what is really needed.  For instance, following land reform in Zimbabwe, how are universities generating a new type of agricultural economist who can connect with new land use patterns?  The food basket has also increased from 10 to 80 commodities and indigenous wild fruits have entered commercial markets. Some crops that did not use to come to the market are now dominant market fixtures. How are universities as knowledge institutions responding to these new ecosystems?

It is lamentable that formally educated Africans cannot understand or contribute to the indigenous economy because at the heart of formal education is a colonial extractive agenda. For instance, in the agriculture sector, the mudhumeni type of extension was introduced as a conduit to impart imported knowledge to farmers. While there were more extension officers than agronomists as specialists, the former white commercial farmers in Zimbabwe and other parts of East and Southern Africa valued  agronomists who specialized on specific crops.  To the extent almost every African farming community has diverse crops, livestock, wild fruits, exotic fruits, natural forests, a single extension officer in is not able to mediate knowledge needs and fill all the gaps.

By holding onto imported knowledge, African institutions of higher learning are not generating relevant knowledge for the Bottom of the Pyramid. In fact they are betraying millions of parents who are spending their hard earned income getting their children to absorb irrelevant imported knowledge. If you generate your own knowledge you should be able to find alternatives and solutions. Conversely, imported knowledge ends somewhere and forces you to go back and consult the original suppliers. For instance, if a combine harvester breaks down, Africans always go back where it came from because they cannot manufacture spare parts.

Who has determined that a university course should be three years?

One of the reasons why academic curricular has become too detached from local contexts is that it relies so much on stale literature which is not fresh knowledge.  African policy makers should not buy the false belief that economics is an international subject which can be used as one size fits all. Economics is certainly different from country to country and region to region. Who has determined that a university course should be three years? Africans have agreed to measure knowledge according to absorptive capacity yet learning in African economies is a process with natural graduation pathways seen through products  and emerging areas of excellence along the way.  You would see that someone is now an expert in thatching roofs, weaving baskets and taming livestock through products.  We cannot assume that a class of 200 economists should all be economists within three years.  We have used academic measures by resorting to tests and assignments.   Our African economies works through experiences of the user not tests. The learning is seen in how the user uses knowledge.

Those who spend three years in university cannot even interpret their knowledge, let alone apply it. Academics reduce knowledge to classroom learning when it should largely be more research-focused. In fact, it should be 30% classroom and 70% refining in the field and not just be about tests. Academics should spend more time in the field and reduce reading and depending on bibliography where if you write a short bibliography you do not pass because you are said to have not read many books.

Context-specific dissertations

Dissertations should not just focus on one topic as if that is the essence of the whole course.  Research should be longitudinal and experiential such that students should start documenting and turning their research into actual solutions from the first year at university so that upon graduation the student is already a specialist. Graduation pathways should be guided by the context such that someone can decide to drop off at some stage and go to work while others continue.  Those studying agricultural engineering should be working with artisans at Siyaso refining knowledge and what is working or not.

The whole notion of attachment is currently too cosmetic and meaningless. It is more like an event covering 6 – 12 months. If African institutions of higher learning cared about generating solutions, they would see that devoting 6 – 12 months of a four year course to practical engagement is a drop in the ocean of real contextual knowledge.  Other faculties should learn from the medical field which is more solutions-focused in that trainee nurses and doctors are always seen in hospital practicing what they are learning. Most medical schools and schools of nursing are also located at hospitals.

In the same vein, why should the faculty of agricultural economics or engineering be at the university campus when it should be where solutions are needed?   Also missing is a seamless transition between agricultural colleges and universities. Ideally, colleges should be extensions of universities and communities the way schools have form 1 to 6. For instance, in Zimbabwe Chibero agricultural college  should be linked to University of Zimbabwe or any other university in such a way that some university courses are actually studied at Chibero college. Students who want to drop off and focus on farming as an enterprise should do so while others continue from Chibero to university without any barriers like current silos where universities think they generate superior knowledge when they are less relevant than colleges.

African countries have unfortunately imported a superiority complex associated with imported knowledge into institutions of higher learning.  We have not adapted natural learning which is more indigenous and very important process which you can’t read from a book.  We have not built ecosystems of learning from our agricultural markets and SMEs where you get all aspects of knowledge and entrepreneurship.  As if that is not enough, Africans are using too much imaginary learning and not equipping children to learn from their context. Why should children in rural Binga and Chireya learn about the Central Business District (CBD) and how are they expected to use that knowledge? Africa still have abundant natural resources, human capital, IKS as well as strong relationships that constitute most of our solutions but policy makers still think external finance that comes with conditions is our salvation.

Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

Mobile: 0772 137 717/ 0774 430 309/ 0712 737 430

Convergence between imported knowledge and indigenous knowledge

African countries have not invested in understanding areas of convergence or overlap between Western knowledge and indigenous knowledge systems (IKS). In addition to continuous dependence on imported knowledge, most African countries suffer from a serious inferiority complex against their knowledge resources.  For instance, they continue to lament about lack of foreign currency, equipment and efficient transport systems as if that is the entire definition of an economy.

emkambo

Ideally, African countries should take time to reflect and compare what they have in abundance with what they lack. They will be surprised to discover that have abundant resources like land, water, sunshine, forests and, more importantly, labor which is lacking in most developed economies. By embracing  imported knowledge, these countries have not developed their rural areas and economies to be able to anchor and utilize talent. Consequently, the best brains are always attracted from rural areas to cities. Highly educated and entrepreneurial Africans fail to fit into rural economies where the only knowledge-intensive pursuits are teaching, nursing and agro-dealership.

There is need to unpack principles of trading between African and Western knowledge.  For instance, how can African countries translate agricultural commodities from physical states to monetary states? How are these countries trading western knowledge with IKS in African cities?  A lot of fluid knowledge is being traded in cities especially interface between African and Western knowledge. It is critical to gather all this resource into a comparative advantage and sell it to the West. The starting point is knowing existing knowledge and its contribution to socio-economic development.

Interface between Western knowledge and IKS

Agriculture is a good example of a sector where Western knowledge and IKS have merged creatively. As agricultural commodities move along value chains there is a notable translation of IKS around value. Farmers produce using local knowledge and local resources but get some bit of western knowledge in the form of chemicals and fertilizer. However they only apply western knowledge where they really think it add value. Most farmers are now selective in using fertilizer especially in cases where manure is not available. They know their soils and micro climate and where their IKS informs them about the likelihood of minimum rainfall, they do not just apply fertilizer.

Farmers also have an intimate connection with local environmental features which inform them without writing anything down. Their entire planning is based on IKS especially in relation to weather. Once commodities are produced that is where they fuse IKS with western knowledge.  For instance, most African countries have not developed appropriate technology for processing or adding value to commodities. This is where knowledge gaps exist.

Western knowledge is not mainly for the benefit of African countries

Western knowledge is mainly designed to exploit opportunities and its main priority is not to feed Africa but preserve African products and make them meet standards of western consumers and markets.  Imported technology is brought in to increase the shelf life of African food systems for western markets.

One of the contributing factors is that African countries are failing to exploit their comparative advantages in the area of valuing food systems so that they can export IKS as a full package. If they had developed good technologies for drying vegetables and processing small grains as well as indigenous fruits, Africans would be very far.

A starting point can be communities valuating their natural resources as part of people’s daily lives and ecosystems. If Honde Valley communities say after producing bananas and other fruits for years they now want to venture into value addition and processing, we should design curricular to answer these needs. The same applies if communities in Dande who survive on masawu want to start producing value-added products, university curricular should focus on those needs.

Besides universities, the industry can also be involved in identifying needs at SMEs like Siyaso – what is the next level of knowledge do you want in terms of technology, finance and equipment?  This should be followed by appropriate financial packages.  We can avoid cases where students just study Banking and Finance. The curricular should be informed by the financial needs of SMEs and the new economy.  Some areas like accountancy and auditing have become redundant for the new economy such as accounting and auditing packages need a complete overhaul. How can we design accounting and auditing principles that apply the burgeoning SMEs sector? After graduating, students should go back and work with communities as knowledge leaders able to lead in imparting packaged knowledge embedded with IKS and imported knowledge.

 

Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

Mobile: 0772 137 717/ 0774 430 309/ 0712 737 430

Why economic growth should not be about turning productive land into buildings

With Africa fast becoming the world’s centre of economic gravity due to its natural resources, it should re-define economic growth. Growth is not about building sky scrapers or turning productive land into residential areas. In addition to food production, African countries should define growth as purifying indigenous knowledge systems into excellence that can be exported to other parts of the world.  Prime land should be devoted to the production of nutritious food systems that are becoming scarce globally.

zimbabwe

A case for strong economic succession pathways

There is no doubt that Africa is going to grow food for the whole world irrespective of threats from climate change. Consequently, the bulk of African land should be a powerful economic resource for future generations. However, value and growth can only be fully unlocked if African countries invest in valuing their resources and knowledge toward becoming champions for the new global economy.

African agriculture is largely being driven by informal markets within which are found micro, small, medium and large scale actors. Since these are within the same ecosystem, there is need another layer in the form of a market that could be a spring-board for new markets like processing and export. Agricultural policies should look at succession issues within vibrant markets that are driving African economies. SMEs are in the same scenario – there are micro, small, medium and large actors mainly in terms of knowledge but their succession is constrained by lack of pathways like land and supportive policies.  While much of the land in peri-urban areas and growth points is being given to residential housing land developers, SMEs do not have land for industrial growth. Unless these issues are addressed, African countries cannot build home-grown economies and solutions.

Micro, small, medium and large enterprises are just labels

At policy level African countries have not developed proper definitions and strategies which show graduation pathways from micro to small, then to medium and so on, with supporting infrastructure and services all the way to large scale. Doing that would lay the foundation for synergies with value chains. For instance, the micro level can be linked with communal farmers trying to process commodities at household level. The small will be clustered with a group of farmers at the subsistence and semi-commercial levels while medium will work with farmers who have wholesaling potential for feeding into bigger wholesalers.  Medium scale can focus on medium scale farmers while large enterprises can do final finishing and packaging for export. There has to be a curricular and dialogue with traders on how they can move to the next level. Knowledge within these ecosystems and markets should be carefully captured and shared in ways that prevent loss of momentum and institutional memory.

What forms of storing wealth can sustain a home-grown African economy?

Growth is also about appropriate ways in which the majority of people can store and preserve their wealth. Traditionally livestock was used as the main store of wealth in Africa and, thankfully, some communities like the Masaai in East Africa, have had the wisdom to stick with these important ways of storing wealth. In most parts of Africa, people no longer have traditional stores of wealth the way hupfumi was defined traditionally.  Globalization and modernization has incentivized Africans to use banks as a way of building wealth.  Now that the whole banking system is collapsing and pensioners cannot get their savings, things are falling apart. The use of financial systems like banks as stores of wealth makes sense in stable economies not threatened by climate change and various forms of economic down-turns.

Limitations of copying succession pathways in formal institutions

Succession pathways followed by formal companies and institutions are tied to treating knowledge as private property. However, this has serious limitations. For instance, Africa’s banking system does not have succession pathways that support home-grown solutions. International banks do not share succession wisdom with indigenous banks. International banks function more like family trees such that Standard Chartered Bank in an African country shares more knowledge with Standard Chartered Bank UK and not with local banks.

While there is nothing wrong with formal organizations sharing knowledge internally, organizations in the same African context should co-create local solutions. African countries should package local businesses and SMEs into specific pathways anchored on indigenous knowledge systems. International corporations and financial systems are failing to work with African systems because there is so much they do not understand about local knowledge pathways and systems. In African systems, patenting of knowledge has been done through relationships built over decades and expressed through informal markets.

How ca we support these pathways in ways that create space for growth? In terms of systems, African policy makers are still fond of using colonial terms like formalization and registering a business for the purposes of paying tax. Why should money be in the fore-front?  Why not give ownership to business entrepreneurs who already know the right thing to do.  Formalization should mainly be for institutional purposes so that policy makers know where SMEs are operating from as a way of then ensuring specific standards, supporting by systems for collecting and sharing evidence. It should not just be for extracting tax.

 

Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

Mobile: 0772 137 717/ 0774 430 309/ 0712 737 430

 

Building knowledge driven succession pathways – Lessons from informal markets

The survival of African informal markets is hinged on fluid succession pathways based on indigenous knowledge systems. Old people who inherited trading stalls from their parents smoothly move out of the market after training their children or relatives to take over. Those taking over will have taken years under-studying those retiring and ultimately the old guard moves to the background, leaving young people to run the market. There are clear pathways for young people to take over. The young start as assistant sales person, become a loader (wenhova), then they get their own push carts which they use as mobile market stalls. After some years, the young graduate into full traders who can go out to buy commodities from farming areas or sponsor farmers to produce specific commodities for them. The entire process is a grooming and knowledge-imparting journey, translating to practical wisdom.

charles dhewa

The curse of structural unemployment

On the other hand, if you read the jobs section of most newspapers in both developed and developing countries, you can see the extent to which the formal world is in a succession crisis. When job descriptions mention the need for someone with a masters degree or PhD plus more than 10 years’ experience, you can automatically see that these are not opportunities for people below 45 years. Unfortunately, this is contributing to structural unemployment among youths.

Absence of clear succession pathways is an enduring challenge for communities, development organizations, governments and private companies in both the global North and South.  One thing holding African governments back is that old people in leadership have become too tired and devoid of ideas. You cannot talk about performance-based achievements for people whose performance has reached its ceiling. When someone is a board chairperson of a company, the next thing is to retire. You cannot expect a 70 year old board chairperson to plan for the company’s future unless young people are broad on board. A 70 year old cannot see or imagine what the company or country will look like in the next 10 to 20 years.

 Recognition for laying the foundation

There is no doubt that in African the old guard has laid a strong foundation for innovation in the form of availing land to the majority, in the case of Zimbabwe. Without a strong foundation every innovation remains a prototype which will not be able to go anywhere or answer specific needs. In addition to wisdom from the old guard, there is definite need for creating spaces where young people can innovate with water, soil and natural resources that are part of the foundation. African academic institutions have not been able to innovate meaningfully because, besides lacking space, they depend too much on imported knowledge which they are failing to contextualize for home-grown economies.

The power of succession planning

Developing countries need succession in terms of knowledge and innovations. Youth empowerment should not just be a buzzword. Succession planning should be taken seriously beyond personalities but also into institutions. There should be pathways through which old knowledge such as proven scientific excellence support young people to venture into the unknown and explore new knowledge-driven opportunities. Young innovators should only come back to elders for wisdom of the past.

When pathways of converting institutional memory into investment opportunities are missing, countries and organizations create structural unemployment against young people who should be taking over the running of institutions into the future. Where the heck does a young innovative person fresh from college get a PhD and 10 years’ experience? Development organizations are notorious for putting such advertisements which they use to ring-fence positions in favor of old people who have been moving from one organization to the other at the expense of fresh energy and blood.

Succession is also about setting up knowledge hubs in communities where future generations can get information and guidance in cases where the old generation is no longer available. When farmers do not have a succession plan that ensures consistent supply of surplus commodities, markets end up crossing the border looking for food which should be produced locally. Consumers need food irrespective of its source, so succession planning at production level is a fundamental national issue.

Succession in formal industries

Succession planning is also missing in the formal industrial sector across Africa. For instance, Zimbabwe has a few bakeries with no clear succession pathways in terms of what happens if they run out of ideas to respond to changing consumer tastes. It is the same case in the industrial cooking oil processing sector where a few old processing plants are now struggling to meet the needs of the increasing population. Succession is also about replacing old machinery. This is affecting fertilizer manufacturing, still stuck in antiquated equipment and brains. A critical question developing countries should be asking themselves is: How do we grow succession pathways for local economies and industries starting from SMEs?

Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

Mobile: 0772 137 717/ 0774 430 309/ 0712 737 430

If development agencies were investors most rural areas would be towns by now

If development organizations and NGOs were investors, districts like Buhera, Binga, Chimanimani, Insiza and many others in Zimbabwe ld be towns by now. The same can be said for several rural areas in whose name millions of United States dollars have been spent in most African countries. Each rural county or district has received not less than 10 development interventions over the past 10 to 20 years. But whose mandate is it to develop rural business models? For instance, is it the role of NGOs to develop cattle, piggery and poultry business models when the private sector should be doing so?

emkambo

Absence of role definition and investment in evidence

In the absence of a clear definition of roles, the above questions cannot be easily answered. An additional question is how much of the information collected by development agencies can be turned into investment opportunities?  Information that is collected through rapid assessments for quickly responding to calls for proposals is not useful to investors who are more interested in trends showing investment opportunities. Unfortunately most of the information focuses on a few wards in a district or districts in a province. Lack of fluid information gathering systems does not only limit investments.

Humanitarian NGOs that want to rebuild livelihoods after cyclones or floods find it difficult to know who had how many assets like cattle when the cyclone struck, what was the volume of food in the community households and how much food was flowing to markets from the community before the disaster? As a result, recovery interventions end up based on assumption of what existed. If people are going to be compensated, where is the basis and how are we going to start when everybody has become vulnerable? The intervention is focusing on recovery from what and how can investors come in? The existence of an information gathering and sharing system would show the direction in which the community was growing prior to the disaster. It would also be easy to retrieve data on different actors and production patterns.

This is the main reason why national statistical agencies should be present at grassroots

Instead of concentrating in capital cities, there are good reasons why each African country’s department that deals with statistics should have a presence in rural areas. This will ensure fluid data is collected, processed and availed in the right context. If data collection is more fluid, it becomes an ideal platform for marketing each county, district or local area to investors as they are able to access information online. Such information should show investment opportunities, culture, labor, local expertise, resources and other assets in the local area. Such information should not be scattered within development agencies who are using it as a secret weapon to compete with each other in the same area.

To the extent information and knowledge is power, it is only power when properly gathered, processed and shared.  A fluid data collection and management system is very feasible and just needs the following:

  • Commitment from government and development agencies in providing initial funding for setting up the system.
  • Raising awareness and consciousness among communities and districts about the importance of gathering their own knowledge and information hubs at community level which they can continuously update. This is the genesis of authentic empowerment.
  • Setting up the knowledge and information system.

The power of relevant content

The local platform should gather fluid literature that is more current and relevant. Currently most information platforms across Africa lack appropriate content and clear demand. They also do not have sustainability models as promoters confuse ICTs with knowledge. Ideally, each platform should have a mechanism for people to access knowledge for a fee as part of sustaining its operations.  For instance, academics and universities which already know the value of data and knowledge can subscribe in order to access data and literature reviews, the same way they subscribe to international libraries and journals, most of whose content is irrelevant to the local context. Students doing their research and those on attachment can be trained on processing and managing diverse datasets related to their disciplines. A major challenge for most university students who try to engage with agricultural value chains is failure to get information they will be looking for and end up resorting to stale literature review.

At the heart of the platform will be ensuring communities and students have access to fresh knowledge not just literature review. Critical content that can be provided include how much was harvested from the local community in the last season, how much was consumed locally and how much was sold, where?  Such data will also help researchers and students to follow the knowledge along value chains and be able to get information all the way from grassroots to national level. At provincial level they can get information on all the districts. Schools can also subscribe to the knowledge hub and access information through their agriculture teachers instead of depending on books written decades ago. Students in livestock areas should get real-time information relating to livestock populations and conditions in their communities. That way, a culture of appreciating and valuing local resources will be instilled in youths.

Knowledge exchange between agriculture and health departments

The platform will enable health institutions to get real-time information on nutrition issues affecting different communities. For instance, local clinics are currently more famous for providing drugs, maternity issues, tablets and injections but do not have information on the local population’s nutrition status which has a significant bearing on local health. Statistics on crops and livestock in a community can alert health personnel to the nutrition condition of a community. If data shows too much production of leafy vegetables at the expense of other crops that contribute to a balanced nutrition, it is a powerful signal for nutritionists to generate the correct advice in liaison with government extension departments.  The department of roads and Civil Protection Unit can be called into action once information on bridges and roads that are in a poor state is collected and quickly shared.

Fluid information should flow frequently and aggregated by platform administrators. This is the kind of modernization that should be supported by governments and development organizations if they want to be relevant in solving real issues. People in the diaspora with a strong feeling and resources to build their communities from wherever they are should be able to use the knowledge platform without passing through government structures in which corruption is endemic. It is retrogressive to have some organizations selectively promoting their own pieces of projects in vast communities with enormous potential. African countries cannot continue to stage-manage community development through demonstration plots and field days which are conducted by one in more than 3000 farmers. This is not representative of the entire community’s potential.

Technology without appropriate content is a waste of resources

Most of the knowledge-based challenges affecting African countries cannot be solved by drones. Knowledge is largely a social and emotional issue than technological. Fluid information gathering requires active, reliable and timely information sources not technology gadgets. For instance, a technology system that does not link producers with diverse markets is not useful even if the producers can be highly productive. Farmers, traders and other value chain actors should interact freely without being wedged to a single mobile network operator. Most communities discuss their issues either as individuals or villages and should decide how to use their knowledge and where to send their information.

In the current era of fake news, the capacity to sift correct knowledge from fake news is fundamental. Ensuring every farmer has a mobile phone is half the story if farmers are not able to tap into streams of processed insights. That is why administrators are important in filtering knowledge so that farmers and many people do not get lost in the sea of information. Instead of trying to solve challenges directly, development agencies should build the capacity of government extension to gather and process information into appropriate decision-making knowledge. The role of extension officers will switch to become more of responding to emerging issues and questions than pushing information to farmers who are also being spammed by mobile service providers.

Aggregation starts with aggregating statistics in terms of what is available and what is needed in different markets followed by aggregation of physical commodities into proper grades and specifications. Several markets can be connected with the local knowledge hub in ways that extend knowledge about aggregation, quality, production calendars and many other aspects. Ultimately the platform will play a key role in organizing local production and linking the county or district with the world. The local knowledge hub or platform can also become a source for the media.  Economic commentators on how economic policies are affecting ordinary people at the grassroots can be identified and accessed through the hub.  At the moment, most economic commentators quoted by the media are based in the capital city and have no clue about what is happening in rural communities.

Rather than leaving communities hanging, after three to five years, development organizations should hand over to the local platform all the information, lessons and networks built over the course of the project. That is where investors can go to find details about opportunities in the county or district –what was tried, failures, successes and emerging opportunities.

Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

Mobile: 0772 137 717/ 0774 430 309/ 0712 737 430

African home-grown economies have their own unique indicators

Convergence between formal and informal African economies has become fertile ground for building home-grown economies that have unique indicators. Cities are platforms for such convergence because they are conduits through which Western knowledge flows into Africa via coasts, air transport and communication systems. While African countries are obsessed with marketing tourist sites like game reserves and natural wonders like the Victoria Falls, they are not tapping into fluid knowledge in the form of culture and values that are quietly being traded in cities between imported and local knowledge.

emkambo kta

How coping strategies influence economic indicators

African home-grown economic indicators are influenced by the fact that most of the economies are still closely linked to natural resources. To that end economic circumstances cannot be adequately expressed in terms of imported indicators like employment and unemployment levels. On the contrary, they focus on individual and community ownership of assets related to agriculture and natural resources as key indicators of economic growth or sustainability. If employment or unemployment levels were a correct indicator of economic growth or stagnation, the over 90% unemployment being mentioned for countries like Zimbabwe would have meant the country is no longer function.

That is why Africa needs home-grown economists who can come up with new, relevant definitions of employment and unemployment. Such efforts would assist in shedding light on how cities like Harare and Nairobi with informal businesses and SMEs constituting more than 80% are surviving with high levels of so-called “unemployment”. How can a city with 96% unemployment continue functioning?  In rural areas, drought or disasters like floods would probably account for such levels of incapacity. A 96% disability is not realistic because it’s close to complete shut-down. How is that possible? Instead of depending on imported theories and textbooks, home-grown economists should generate valuation systems that can assist communities to fully know the value of their natural resources. All African communities value what individuals have as a business. You cannot teach entrepreneurship to people who are already practicing different forms of entrepreneurship.

eMKambo recently met a Masaai livestock herder/owner in Masaai Mara grasslands of Kenya. Oiling his gun, the herder said after obtaining a Masters degree at Jomo Kenyatta University he decided to go back and connect with cattle production which he grew up doing, thanks to his grand-parents. With an amazing air of contentment, the herder narrated a recent story in which business people from Nairobi were bringing vehicles to him persuading him to exchange five of his cattle with a Toyota Prado. “What would I use the Prado for?  I am more rich and satisfied with my cattle,” he said with a knowing smile. The Masaai gentlemen is an example of a home-grown economic agent able assess and value his wealth differently.

Imported terminologies do not adequately explain African economies

The Masaai are satisfied with their wealth.  African SMEs are surviving within the so-called 90% unemployment level. Rather than use imported terminologies to value African wealth, African think tanks and universities should generate new valuation knowledge that speaks to local contexts. Such knowledge should guide policy review and remove Africans’ inferiority complexes about their knowledge which is limiting capacity to exploit African comparative advantages based on ownership of natural resources.

Why do African countries agree to measure their poverty datum line using a dollar a day when the majority do not use dollars? African countries should be using social indicators like depression or erosion of values among communities whose relatives are migrating to the diaspora in response to economic down turns. Another indicator should be related to knowledge and information. The extent to which an increase in the cost of communication has become a barrier to knowledge and information sharing is a powerful socio-economic indicator in African economies. A related indicator is how increases in transport costs are leading to the break-down of social fabrics as urban dwellers no longer visit their relatives in rural areas to replenish their knowledge, norms, values and wisdom. The roots of an indigenous home-grown economy are directly linked to social not economic factors.

What happens if African countries stop using foreign currency to value their economies?

African countries have embraced imported western knowledge as if they did not their own knowledge before colonization. Many ordinary people in Africa have never stopped wondering why African governments are allowing their natural resources and food systems to be valued and priced using United States Dollars.  If China wants tobacco from Zimbabwe while Zimbabwe needs machinery and fertilizer from China, why is it not possible for these commodities be exchanged directly without the United States Dollar coming in between?

The value of the tobacco can be easily agreed up and same with the value of the machinery or fertilizer without any money exchanging hands. The same notion can be extended to minerals. Whoever wants African gold should bring what is needed in Africa, with the commodities simply exchanged. As opposed to African countries converting their commodities to foreign currency before buying what is needed from importers of African commodities, those in need of tobacco and minerals should be the ones bringing foreign currency where it is needed but commodities of equivalent value should suffice.

Why is globalization silent about knowledge?

Global trade emphasizes free trade areas and selling of commodities but knowledge is not considered part of the economic and commodity focus. How is knowledge traded as part of global trade just like commercial trade of goods and services?  There are no specific avenues and vehicles for tracking knowledge trading between countries and commodities.  International economic development practice uses indicators like employment creation, income levels and population growth, excluding knowledge as an indicator or component of economic growth.  There has to be more appropriate definitions of an economy in the African sense without continued use of adopted definitions of the economy and economic growth from borrowed and imported knowledge. It is very important and urgent to start developing African home-grown economic indicators that do not just consider economics but embraces social indicators such as culture, tradition and the whole society. All this has its own growth paths from rural to urban areas.

Challenges with domesticating technology

Lack of attention to home-grown indicators has increased African challenges around the adoption of technology. The Western and imported notion of trading platforms was meant for trading commodities without using cash but some corporates in African countries like Zimbabwe have abused platforms by using them for trading money. Had African countries developed their own platforms they would have embedded software to, for instance, modernize barter trade which has proven to be more resilient in all economies across the globe.

Ethical deployment of technology platform should anchor African mass markets which creatively combine barter trade with modern transaction modes.  This is how authentic commodity exchanges can be created and anchored in technology in ways that create networks for facilitating commodities to find each other and transact with no need for money. Communities should then be educated about the fact that by clamoring for cash they are burdening themselves when all they need is to know their needs first.  If money is for buying commodities and services, why not bring those commodities and services together and eliminating the need for cash and middlemen who are abusing platforms?

Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

Mobile: 0772 137 717/ 0774 430 309/ 0712 737 430

Key characteristics of a home-grown African economy

A home-grown economy is all about identity and some identity features start from a country’s name.  During the colonial era Rhodesia had its own meaning and image associated with Cecil John Rhodes. Come independence in 1980, Rhodesia became Zimbabwe, derived from Zimba raMabwe – a house built of stones. Naming a country is often based on enormous amounts of collective consensus and unpacking the name has more to do with a shared culture and tradition which is the backbone of home-grown solutions. A well-packaged culture is the foundation of every home-grown economy. Building a home-grown economy starts with answering questions like who are we? What is our culture?  What are our values? What human and natural resources do we have?

kta.JPG

Culture and tradition is part of natural resources

Most African countries continue to be envied for their natural resources by the rest of the world. However, building a home-grown economy should start with re-classifying existing resources in ways that reflect strong relationships between culture, tradition and natural resources. For instance, Zimbabwe’s policy makers are still using the colonial characterization of natural farming regions one to five according to amounts of annual rainfall received. Characterizing an economy on rainfall patterns  without considering elements like culture including languages of the local people who have traditionally used local resources, land and minerals, underestimates important characteristics of an economy.

Socio-economic development patterns cannot be determined by rainfall patterns only. That is why all African countries should revisit colonial classifications of their economic drivers and production zones. Mineral dykes should be re-classified in order to clearly define opportunities for local communities. In a changing climate, it no longer makes sense to define farming areas according to annual rainfall amounts. Instead, watersheds and large river basins should be defined as green belts requiring specific resources.   The same apples with forests which should have their own classification and definition from a socio-economic perspective. Cultures and languages should be accordingly classified as part of natural resources so that it becomes clear where Shona, KiSwahili, isiNdebele, Nyanja and all diverse African languages which mediate knowledge used to exploit natural resources begins and ends. Currently, with the dominance of English through imported education systems, it is difficult to tell where local languages begin, end and overlap.

Unlocking investment potential and opportunities

Carefully repackaging natural resources with existing culture and tradition can empower communities to own and control investment opportunities. For instance, each community can ask itself questions like – since we have identified all our natural resources, what opportunities can we open to the outside world? In relation to culture, what investment opportunities can we identified around art, dance, music and others? Each community has its culture which can be converted into knowledge – driven content like films and food.

Although African countries have school of mines, they do not have capacity to add value to their minerals due to lack of appropriate technology. Consequently, mining remains an extractive industry that cannot adequately contribute to building home-grown economies. Good mining policies are useless if a country does not have appropriate knowledge. Anyone who brings equipment ends up being the mine owner. Capacity to produce mining equipment is still lacking and that is why African countries are competing for extractive investors.

Absence of investment analyses

African countries are not benefitting from their resources because they have not invested in assessing and valuing their resources. A home-grown economy needs a whole university focusing on valuating resources, generating budgets and business plans for communities in economic zones.  Currently African countries are just giving out mining concessions to foreign companies who are doing all the explorations and God knows how much information these companies are hiding from African governments, especially relating to the value of local minerals.  Each community should have local invest analysts whose main roles include valuating resources like minerals, forests, soils, wildlife and water bodies. Where perennial rivers exist, valuation can adequately inform setting up of green belts to ensure food security. Valuation will reveal the folly of governments and development organizations trying to drive an economy using irrigation schemes, most of which were set up to supplement rain-fed production not commercial purposes.

 

Agricultural policies should be developed from the bottom

The current practice of setting and deploying agricultural policies from the top is slowing down the growth of home-grown economies. Policies should be informed by valuation of the agriculture sector covering water, land and production capacity. Such details should inform required budget unlike budgeting annually from the top and ending up dedicating more than half of the budget to a few agricultural commodities. A bottom up approach to agricultural policy development will see communities participating in valuating resources. After all they know what they need for agricultural support, gaps and where support is lacking. Communities can then be assisted by specialists to do the costing and budgeting.  Currently most African countries do agricultural budgeting annually. It is difficult to promote agriculture and grow an economy that way.

Community-based plans should inform the national agricultural strategic plans. There should be a 5 – 10 year investment plan backed by community priorities and targets. For instance, communities in Chimanimani, Machakos and other areas should participate in budgeting their local agricultural activities. They know what they have and the nature of support they need. Building home-grown economies is also about moving away from the Mudhumeni type of extension which has a strong colonial background (teacher-student relationship between extension officers and farmers). There should be a team of experts working with communities based on available resources. For instance, fruit specialists should be concentrated in Honde Valley (for exotic fruits) and Dande (for Masawu). Livestock areas like Gwanda should have a concentration of appropriate skills.  These experts should work with communities in developing short, medium and long-term plans (2 – 10 years).  This approach speaks to sustainability and devolution. You can’t talk about devolution without experts at the grassroots taking care of issues daily.

African academic institutions should work very closely with the agriculture sector. Currently universities are pursuing academic excellence with no links to the economy.  Each university should have an outreach budget that can be used to decolonize the notion of student attachment from a focus on urban industries.  There should be a budget for students to go out and work with smallholder agricultural communities, irrigation schemes, catchments and villages.  That is an important way of inculcating passion for local resources, practices and knowledge. The ministry of agriculture should be part of assessing graduates to prove that the student has impacted the local community in which s/he was attached.

Minerals and arable land is found in rural and farming areas not in cities. Forests are in rural areas not cities and farming happens in rural areas. How can African countries tap into their rural economies so that they become hubs of investment opportunities?  It is ironic that African countries allow money to circulate in cities where most of our resources are absent.

Citizen participation in the development and implementation of government policies

Home-grown economies can only be sustained through promoting genuine participation of citizens in policy development, formulation and implementation. Unfortunately, in most African countries policies are crafted from the top and in cities.  For instance, Zimbabwe’s Transitional Stabilization Programme (TSP) is barely understood by the majority and remains just a buzzword. Each community should identify local socio-economic intermediaries whose roles include extracting local knowledge, solving conflicts and explaining opportunities. Ideally such roles should be fulfilled by traditional leaders like chiefs.

Unfortunately most African chiefs become chiefs through traditional structures and not by merit. This would not be a big problem if there were leadership colleges for chiefs where they would acquire or sharpen important skills like articulating investment opportunities in their areas. Most chiefs have either dropped out of school or have been shunned by the formal education system. Ironically, they find themselves conducting complicated traditional leadership roles that are very important for local economic development. As custodians of natural resources, traditional leaders should have an appreciation of investment analysis in order to accurately value and protect resources for their communities. They cannot just preside over petty cases. Local leaders should go for formative training of leaders just as chief executives go for retreats where they hone each other’s skills as practitioners dealing with complex issues that require emotional awareness and intelligence. Grooming traditional leadership structures to be able to value their own communities and resources is an integral part of building a home-grown economy.

The unfortunate role of partisan politics and imported governance systems

The majority of African countries have imported partisan politics and have failed to separate the ruling party from government which are functioning like one entity. By nature it is difficult to control favoritism. Much of the resources end up following the political route as opposed to the government route from the head offices to the village. The minister belongs to a political party and resources go to the District Administrator who is a member of the same political party and is expected to hand over commodities to a chief who is also expected to belong to the same party for sharing to villagers who are members of his same party.

For a home-grown economy to flourish there should be mechanisms to neutralize politicians and their political parties in communities. Socio-economic development should be separated from politics. In communities with abundant natural resources, investors do not know who to talk to between the District Administrator, Chief Executive Officer of the Rural District Council, Council Chairperson or local Member of Parliament (MP). Too many administrative structures are complicating entry points for investors.  Ultimately, there is an imposition from the top where, for instance, investors get licences to mine in local communities like Chiadzwa from Harare without consulting traditional leaders who just see things happening.

Due to the dominance of imported political structures, rural African communities now think politicians are problem solvers. This is because the politicians are using persuasive information during elections to generate false promises.  This puts communities in a comfort zone – “Our MP has promised us a dam and development so let us relax.”  As part of building home-grown African economies, politicians should not be allowed to use empty promises in ways that destroy our communities.  The fact that resources from the tax system come through the MP results in the MP receiving undue credit.  Communities are not aware of the fact that tax payers money coming to them through the MP to build their communities is not coming from the MP.

There are more negatives than positives in having political structures at grassroots. Such structures disintegrate communities socially and economically.  Once communities are disintegrated there is no cohesive planning and implementation of community initiatives.  An example is food for work where the MP often selects workers according to partisan lines. People with appropriate skills, for instance, in road rehabilitation will be excluded if they belong to a different political party.  More importantly, political differences hamper sharing of knowledge and skills to the community’s disadvantage.  Even at national level, opposition parties do not share their ideas with everyone on the pretext that the ruling party will take the credit from such ideas.

 

Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

Mobile: 0772 137 717/ 0774 430 309/ 0712 737 430