Creating new knowledge and minimizing intellectual recycling

Besides lack of internship opportunities, university students and faculties are struggling to translate academic knowledge into research that answers a need. It is no longer enough to conduct academic research that gets filed in university libraries. On the other hand, development partners and government departments that are working with rural communities are struggling to establish sustainable entry and exit strategies. The private sector is also struggling to design evidence-based market-driven business models.

If you share the above concerns and you are passionate about translating university research into a career path, get in touch with Knowledge Transfer Africa (KTA). We have started offering guidance and mentorship for university students and faculties keen to develop research themes in agricultural ecosystems, rural development and financial modelling. KTA has also started assisting development organizations to design sustainable programmes. The private sector is also being assisted to design market-driven business models.

For more information send an email to: charles@knowledgetransafrica.com / clever@knowledgetransafrica.com / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

0772 137 717 / 0772 137 768

Why some farmers and traders succeed by listening to their own advice

An increase in advice from diverse sources is becoming counter-productive for smallholder farmers in many developing countries. Besides over-saturation, there is no shortage of conflicting advice. Many farmers are wondering why they are being blamed for not taking farming as a business when the majority of formally educated graduates are busy looking for jobs rather than using knowledge they have acquired from school/college/university to improve their agricultural-driven local economies.  eMKambo is intrigued by how some farmers who participate in African agricultural markets succeed through listening to their own advice.

emkambo

For curious smallholder farmers, listening to your own advice is equivalent to combining your intuitions with observations and ideas from the market.  Without such a combination, it is difficult for farmers to improve their perceptions on price and profitability.  Rather than depending entirely on advice from other people, farmers who frequent markets ultimately hone their pricing and marketing skills. They become aware that better pricing decisions are based on a trade-off between margin and price perception. Such decisions can only come from actively participating in agricultural markets and identifying commodities that determine market behaviour.

Empowering farmers to stop defending what is no longer working

It is from active market participation that farmers develop personal knowledge mastery and fact-based market awareness. They become aware of the risks associated with depending on the commercial intuition of traders.  With time, some of the farmers will become knowledge brokers able to analyse market data toward improving their overall market perception in ways that reveal the impact of all commodities. Without evidence from the market, farmers will continue defending practices that are no longer working. Rather than looking for easy answers, markets enable farmers to explore more options and opportunities. On the other hand, taking advice from everyone can lead many farmers to pour their energy into strategies that do not result in significant improvement.

Interested in progress than in change for its own sake

 Listening to personal advice and intuition triggered by agricultural markets prompts farmers to be interested in progress rather than be satisfied with change for its own sake. They suddenly become aware of the importance of getting rid of old knowledge in order to create space for new knowledge. Part of relying on one’s personal advice as an agricultural value chain actor is building the capability to replace obsolete knowledge with new knowledge.

In a world saturated with all kinds of agricultural ideas, value chain actors are better off focusing on top quality knowledge than a lot of mediocre content from everywhere. Unfortunately, due to too much information being pushed to farmers and other value chain actors, they have to painstakingly sift through huge volumes to find the desired knowledge. The extent to which too much information or knowledge is becoming counter-productive is shown by how social media streams such as WhatsApp are now clogged with trivia than valuable knowledge. Listening to personal advice is one way value chain actors can filter all this information into knowledge.

Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

eMkambo Call Centre: 0771 859000-5/ 0716 331140-5 / 0739 866 343-6

 

 

Rainy seasons show how developing countries struggle with preserving food

While rainfall can easily be associated with high agricultural production, in many African countries abundant rains also come with enormous damage to food that has already been produced. At least 30% of food in Africa is said to be lost before it is consumed. Too much rainfall accounts for a significant proportion of such post-harvest losses. Major efforts to address post-harvest losses have focused on maize grain with metal silos and chemicals being introduced in many farming communities.  This is in spite of the fact that maize grain is just one component of local food baskets.

emkambo

A comprehensive post-harvest strategy should look beyond maize grain and embrace the whole basket of commodities that have to be preserved, especially against rainfall-related damages. Unfortunately, as soon as the rainy season begins, African policy makers and inputs providers tend to be pre-occupied with moving inputs to farmers without commensurate attention to preserving what has already been produced.  With little attention paid to market infrastructure, rainfall also damages food in informal markets.

Why most smallholder farmers do not invest in storage facilities

Low volumes of commodities produced by individual smallholder farmers make it less cost effective for them to invest in storage or incur costs in taking the few commodities to the market. As a result, the majority of smallholder farmers keep their food and harvests in their kitchens, living rooms and bedrooms. Commodities kept that way may not be ideal for the market. There is also a limit to the quantity of commodities a farmer can store in the house. Unavailability of appropriate or sufficient storage facilities also limits production levels as available storage influences production decisions. Even where conditions are suitable for doubling productivity, farmers hesitate to increase production because their storage capacity cannot be equally doubled.

Opportunities for collective storage

Containerization of agricultural commodities at community level is one innovation that eMKambo has started exploring together with new partners. Through this innovation, solar powered containers will be set up in production zones.  This will help farmers to collectively aggregate their commodities, providing a sense of the collective volume of commodities from one area.  Containerization will also help farmers to hold onto their commodities and sell profitably rather than be pushed to get rid of commodities due to lack of storage and preservation capacity.  Below are some of the commodities to be preserved in containers:

Onions – Apart from drying, storage is one of the main challenges facing onion farmers, leading inconsistent market supply in countries like Zimbabwe.  Drying and storing in containers will address problems like loss of quality and reduced shelf life.

Squash butternuts – In food markets across Zimbabwe, during gluts, butternuts can sell for 22c/kg and the price can go up to 72c/kg during periods of scarcity.  This variation is not good for the consumer and the market although it may be good for a few farmers who may have butternuts during scarcity periods.  Containerization and warehousing will solve some of these supply and demand mismatches.

High value commodities (red, yellow & green peppers) – These commodities cannot be produced in winter.  During off-season their price can be as high as $2/kg.  Containerization and storage will ensure an even flow of these commodities into the market, avoiding wild price variability.

Fruits (apples, oranges and peaches) – These tend to run out completely and can be stored when in season for release when out of season.

Dry crops (groundnuts, sugar beans, etc.,) – These can also be stored for release as and when the market is ready to pay a better price.  Prices of sugar beans also tend to go up towards the rainy season as most people purchase for seed.

Sweet potatoes – These can also be stored in containers. Given that most farmers store this crop in the field, storage facilities can quickly release land for other uses or for preparation processes so that the next crop is planted on time.

Small grains – These can also be stored for both human and livestock consumption. An increase in the production of indigenous chickens has started driving the demand for small grains in Zimbabwe. This is likely to stimulate small grains production. A critical look at preservation and storage will give agriculture a complete picture.  It is should not be just about addressing insects and rushing commodities to the market.  Investment in post-harvest and market infrastructure will help all value chain actors such as producers and consumers.  In most cases, commodities are produced when the market is not ready.  Besides protecting agricultural commodities from rainfall, containerization is a critical stage in enabling market readiness.

Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

eMkambo Call Centre: 0771 859000-5/ 0716 331140-5 / 0739 866 343-6

Overcoming misconceptions about involving users in creating knowledge

One of the most enduring misconceptions in developing countries is the notion that if farmers and rural people are not involved in creating knowledge they will not adopt what comes from outside. As a result, billions of US dollars have gone into diverse versions of participatory development approaches. Unfortunately, as soon as donor funding dries up, most communities either go back to their original practices or they become more confused about what course of action to take.

Development agencies have not invested in understanding the main reasons why some approaches and technologies are adopted effortlessly while others are rejected even though they seem to make sense. While involving users in creating knowledge is considered a key component of ensuring adoption, many African countries have several technologies that have been developed and adopted without involving users. Experts who understand human psychology have gone ahead to successfully create machines and frame works without consulting users. For example, rural African communities are teeming with grinding mills, oil expelling machines, tractors, water pumps, solar panels, cultivators, planters, ploughs and many other tools that have shaped livelihoods. No farmer or rural artisan was consulted in designing, pre-testing and rolling out all these gadgets yet they have spread like wild fire.

emkambo

Experts should not under-estimate themselves

The world is a better place because of experts and gifted geniuses who can accurately see what is hidden to the majority of human beings. While it makes sense to consult or involve communities in generating knowledge and technologies that affect their lives, what if you are introducing something entirely new that a particular community has never seen it work anywhere before? How can you expect people to have an opinion about what they do not know they need to know? If you do not know what you need to know, everything new is acceptable. There are many situations where an outsider can clearly see the big picture in ways that local communities may never see even in 100 years of participatory engagement.

In addition, many people do not take too long to be convinced about something.  If, as an expert, you are cork-sure about what you want to introduce, why waste resources trying to convince everyone?  For instance, why would a monetary specialist waste time and money trying to get ordinary people to understand the intricacies of financial dynamics in the economy?  If you have done your homework as an expert why look for non-experts to tell you what to do?  There are issues that are better left to experts with the majority happy to be consumers and adopters.  If those who designed WhatsApp had tried to involve everyone from conception up to rolling out, do you think the technology could have seen the light of day?

Participatory approaches should not be embraced uncritically. As long as experts and promoters are confident about what they are introducing, communities can put their faith in something new and eventually adopt it without doubt. The world is what it is due to numerous top-down approaches and imposed technologies that have been massively adopted because they answered and continue to answer a need.  Experts and designers are better off conceiving technologies in isolation and bringing them to users when the time is right.  Many people do not have the time, patience and temperament to be involved in the whole journey through which a knowledge product travels from being an idea to reality. There is a place for the wisdom of the crowd and a place for experts.

 Not everyone cares about nutrition research

Given the complexity of nutrition knowledge, it is rather far-fetched to expect every consumer to be knowledgeable about carbohydrates, protein, fats, vitamin B6, etc.  It is the role of experts to package all these important food attributes without bothering ordinary people with all the details.  It is like expecting every car driver to have intimate knowledge about the engine – how pistons work inside the engine, electrical issues in the car, etc.  Experts and those who have made it their mission to promote these technologies should do so without causing unnecessary cognitive over-load in ordinary people.

charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

eMkambo Call Centre: 0771 859000-5/ 0716 331140-5 / 0739 866 343-6

Lessons from how informal markets keep agricultural knowledge fresh

Just as agriculture markets prefer fresh fruits, vegetables, meat, eggs and other commodities, knowledge on all these commodities should also be kept fresh. It is through regular visits to the market that farmers are able to keep their knowledge fresh.  Farmers who extend loans to traders in the form of commodities also extend knowledge about those commodities so that traders are able to fully explain the value of each commodity to consumers.  However, because knowledge has a way of sticking just as it also leaks, some of the crucial feedback from consumers sticks with the trader and does not go back to the farmer. It means farmers have to find ways of accessing such knowledge. That role is often played by the market as a whole.

dhewa
Lessons from how informal markets keep agricultural knowledge fresh
Just as agriculture markets prefer fresh fruits, vegetables, meat, eggs and other commodities, knowledge on all these commodities should also be kept fresh. It is through regular visits to the market that farmers are able to keep their knowledge fresh. Farmers who extend loans to traders in the form of commodities also extend knowledge about those commodities so that traders are able to fully explain the value of each commodity to consumers. However, because knowledge has a way of sticking just as it also leaks, some of the crucial feedback from consumers sticks with the trader and does not go back to the farmer. It means farmers have to find ways of accessing such knowledge. That role is often played by the market as a whole.

Ideally, customer feedback should reach the farmer so that s/he is able to improve production methods and fulfil market demands. For that to happen, there has to be a smooth flow of knowledge from the market back to farmers and vice versa, not just a trickle of knowledge. To ensure there is a genuine knowledge flow, farmers have to create relationships in the market. That way, they keep their knowledge fresh rather than rely on stale knowledge that may not be in line with market dynamics. On the other hand, when farmers outsource their commodities to traders, transporters and other actors they are also out-sourcing knowledge about those commodities. That is why most traders and transporters end up knowing more about tomatoes and fruits than producers.

Challenges of replacing old with new agricultural knowledge
A critical part of keeping knowledge fresh is unlearning old habits and practices. Many capacity building and training programmes introduced in rural communities by development partners are failing to make a difference because they are not enabling farmers to unlearn old knowledge so that space for fresh knowledge is created. As if that is not enough, the African formal education system continues to promote learning new things rather than start with developing methods of unlearning what has been learnt over generations that is preventing new ways of doing things from taking root.

The situation has been worsened by how most of the old knowledge has been institutionalized. For instance, land preparation using ploughs has been deeply ingrained and institutionalized in African farming communities since the 1950s. Private companies have been established to produce ploughs, cultivators and hoes towards reinforcing conventional agriculture and associated habits. A few decades ago, government extension departments were at the fore-front of promoting ploughs and cultivators. But suddenly, some of them have started sermonizing about the importance of conservation farming which prefers zero tillage and discourages ploughing. Since the majority of farmers have not forgotten what they were taught a few decades ago, we now have a dilemma where extension agents are facing a hard time trying to reverse practices they once advocated.

It is like breaking concrete with drawing pins
The way conventional farming methods have been rammed into farmers’ consciousness over the past decades is such that getting them to unlearn those methods is like trying to break concrete with drawing pins. It is difficult to change age-old habits that have been institutionalized through training programmes such as farming as a business. It has taken generations for some of the habits to stick and these cannot be reversed through two to five year NGO programmes. Unlearning may take probably much longer than it has taken farmers to acquire all the knowledge currently in use. It is easier to keep doing the same thing than to embrace new ways of thinking, farming and marketing.

In most cases, farmers blame buyers of agricultural commodities rather than take responsibility for acquiring new knowledge. As a business, African agriculture will not be transformed through finding faults but seeking solutions. Informal markets are trying to provide some of the solutions. These markets have a way of building the capacity of farmers and other value chain actors to unlearn slowly but surely. Commodities that have been produced using old knowledge can be identified in the market. The poor performance of those commodities on the market forces farmers to dump old practices and embrace new knowledge which produces superior commodities.

Without active learning and experimentation, the agriculture sector will become an echo chamber where the same ideas are echoed all the time. Informal markets address these challenges by ensuring that famers and other value chain actors unlearn old ways and acquire fresh knowledge through extending their awareness outside their spheres of influence. For those farmers who are curious enough to seek new peers who bring fresh perspectives, informal markets provide the necessary diversity that increases the potential for serendipitous discoveries. Each informal market has structures and processes that enable farmers and traders to discern when and with whom to share knowledge. That is how farmers test alternative perspectives, generate competitive knowledge and go back home to put new lessons into practice. However, this kind of learning and unlearning fostered by the market does not happen where there is no memory. To a large extent informal markets function as the conscience and memory of the agricultural economy. The markets are always updating mental models of value chain actors and freshening up their memory.

Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com
Website: http://www.emkambo.co.zw / http://www.knowledgetransafrica.com
eMkambo Call Centre: 0771 859000-5/ 0716 331140-5 / 0739 866 343-6

Some of the reasons why small grains continue to resist winner take all commercialization

From Mali to Zimbabwe and South Africa to Southern Sudan, small grains remain an integral part of mainstream local food systems.  There are many reasons why small grains continue to pack a huge socio-economic punch in many countries.  To revisit and stimulate a frank discussion on the power of small grains, eMKambo has just completed an informative survey in eight districts of Zimbabwe.  Besides a longitudinal assessment of how small grains perform in the market, the survey (whose results will be released soon) tried to surface production trends and some of the telling value chain patterns. Although the survey focused on Zimbabwe, its findings seem to resonate with the situation many African countries.

new-job

Part of slow but resilient tribal traditions

While small grains are being promoted from a climate change perspective, what makes them special is that they have become a key component of many tribal traditions. Very few farmers grow small grains for money but for other benefits whose value is impossible to quantify. In African food markets, small grains are considered slow moving commodities whose income is rarely consistent. But there are traders more comfortable with this slow nature than fast-moving horticulture commodities.

The eMKambo survey mentioned above tries to also answer the following question: Why is small grains commercialization not picking up more speed in African food markets that are being contaminated by a fast-food chain culture?  Efforts to modernize African agriculture seem to be pushing local and global versions of the green revolution. On the other hand, small grains are quietly resisting commercialization due to their unique capacity to reflect the diversity of food systems, gender, lifestyles and other invisible strengths.  For many farming communities confronting climate change, small grains are at the centre of purpose-driven and sustainable agricultural practices. Most smallholder farmers are not motivated by incremental improvements such as high yields from high inputs.  They are more satisfied with getting best outcomes from a holistic agriculture system.

As seen through contract farming models, it seems commercial agriculture creates additional financial and socio-economic uncertainties which push farmers to side-market as they realize that income from contract arrangements can barely meet all important needs.  Production and utilization of small grains and other marginal crops has empowered farming communities to establish traditional governance systems and standards that ensure sustainability for the whole agricultural ecosystem. Where commercial efforts are obsessed with supply chains, smallholder farmers whose decisions are driven by small grains take an ecosystems approach.  There is hard-earned awareness among farmers that preserving and rebuilding small grains seed systems is a proven insurance against hunger and starvation.

Harnessing shared knowledge

While ICTs and globalization seem to be transforming human relationships, small grains-based food systems continue to influence how many African communities function. Although, western diets are infiltrating African food systems, mostly in urban areas, social media is also strengthening local and traditional food systems through spreading consumer awareness about the benefits of small grains and other marginalized foods. Farmers and rural communities have started using social media to retrieve and revive some of the knowledge around small grains and local food that was on the verge of getting lost permanently. Africans in the diaspora are receiving small grains and other foods sent by their relatives based in Africa. While it may appear forces of globalization are destroying local food systems, they are in fact also rejuvenating them and providing a buffer against wholesale commercialization.

Armed with fine-grained insights from agricultural markets and smallholder farming areas, it is possible to increase small grains production, marketing and consumption in ways that can change the fortunes of many farmers and consumers.  However, a lot will happen if there is an overhaul of current agribusiness models that are over-promoting industrial agriculture at the expense of local food systems.

 

Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

eMkambo Call Centre: 0771 859000-5/ 0716 331140-5 / 0739 866 343-6

The hybrid nature of most African economies

Most African economies are often presented as being dual, comprising the formal and informal economy. However, in real practice the two parts function as a hybrid economy which borrows from the two parts. Nowhere is this scenario more visible than in the agriculture sector where there is a fusion of formal and informal approaches all the way from production to the market. While efforts to formalize African economies are based on technical approaches, carefully harnessing lessons from the open and informal market will transform African economies in unique ways. Rather than wholesale formalization, a key starting point should be understanding resilience elements of African informal markets.
pic

Exploring the intersection between formal and informal economies
Open informal markets seem to have an in-built dynamism and resilience that enable them to cope with a rapidly globalizing economy. The same cannot be said about formal institutions such as parastatals which seem to have not been designed for a networked global economy. Where formal institutions plan in terms of months, quarters and years, open and informal markets plan in terms of hours, days and weeks. Such emergency mindsets enable informal institutions to deal with economic uncertainties in ways that formal and hierarchical institutions cannot. It looks like ideas and knowledge from several traders and market actors can inform joint action between formal and informal economic development initiatives. Such a hybrid socio-economic development model can generate superior outcomes than continue treating formal and informal economies as separate entities.

The power of stories in building a hybrid economy
Most participatory methods that have dominated African agriculture and rural development for decades have not sufficiently influenced agriculture markets. One of the reasons for mediocre success is that selling agricultural commodities has been considered a single transaction yet it should be a continuous relationship building and learning process, full of stories. While agricultural production is often a technical process, stories have a more powerful role in pitching commodities to consumers and engaging with customers as well as building a strong rapport with potential customers.

tafadzwa

The hybrid character of African agricultural economies tends to be visible in open markets. Each commodity on the market tells its own story through its appearance. Commodities that have travelled a long distance to the market can communicate that fact. On the other hand, consumers who engage with farmers in the market trust the farmers’ capability to produce food the right way.  This trust between farmers, traders and consumers is reinforced through stories that are shared in the market. The stories are used to persuade and influence consumers and other buyers.

Creative farmers and traders have developed smart ways of demonstrating what is common between them and potential customers. Those who have been in the open market for years have fully studied consumer behavior.  They know that consumers like people who are just like them and they buy from people they like.  That is why totems and home area often influence buying decisions.  A consumer is most likely to buy from a farmer or trader who comes from his/her home area.  That makes a difference between a farmer/trader who stays in agribusiness for years and the one who does not.

 Rather than quickly getting down to business, farmers, traders, consumers, transporters and many other actors devote meaningful time to cultivating relationships in the market through stories. At the end, a handshake is a more powerful contract than a written document. A trader is convinced the farmer with whom s/he shared a story will certainly bring what s/he promised to the market.  Going forward, stories are further used to win and retain new customers and build more relationships. Through a series of individual and collective stories, open markets keep every value chain actor motivated and focused to fulfil everyone’s expectations. Every story is more than a socio-economic contract that contributes to the resilience of the whole food economy. The effectiveness of such contracts is revealed through no cases of farmers and traders suing each other for failure to honor any contract.

How technical people can harness knowledge from informal markets

Productive economic hybrids between formal and informal economies can become a reality when technical experts embrace humility in the awareness that they do not know everything. They have to share their individual uncertainties, hesitations, doubts and fears in order to gain collective confidence from informal actors. The next level should be building communities of practice comprising actors from both the formal mindset towards creating a safe place to test alternative ideas that can inform emergent socio-economic solutions. It is not helpful to continue pretending we have two separate economies that do not overlap or speak to each other. The informal economy has actors who are good at accumulating ideas, sampling new practices as well as mixing and matching what they learn as they work.  Such capacity to navigate multiple domains is very important in an increasingly networked global economy that African economies find themselves.

The formal mindset has enormous value in promoting specialization that makes economic planning predictable. Bringing them together with informal actors will produce a productive blend of efforts comprising those who are cautious and those not afraid to cross socio-economic boundaries and sometimes break those boundaries. Besides seeing socio-economic patterns ahead of everyone else, actors in African informal markets are adept at living on the edge of the future and detecting signals from a wide range of people and ideas at their disposal.  That enables them to quickly adjust to dynamic economic environments. Such agility is often lacking in formal institutions. It is through organized cross-pollination between formal and informal economies that developing countries will be able to generate sustainable solutions to their wicked socio-economic challenges. Advice from big global institutions will not make much difference without local knowledge from the informal and open market where practical tangible and intangible knowledge is generated every day.

charles@knowledgetransafrica.com  / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@knowledgetransafrica.com

Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com

eMkambo Call Centre: 0771 859000-5/ 0716 331140-5 / 0739 866 343-6